Throughout the article the author uses
emotional, logical and ethos appeal to establish his credibility. The author starts
with anecdotes in his first attempt to compare cause and effect. The author
uses Roy Hallum receiving as expert’s testimony to appeal to the audience for
the article credibility. The second cause and effect can be found in paragraph
two, where Memphis resident was kidnaped and taken to Iraq was link to an immigration
fraud. The author uses facts to attempt to establish his credibility. The
author does not address the opposition making his argument weak. He is bias and
is trying to aim at the audience of conservatives because based on the events
that the immigration fraud was linked to an ex kidnaper of an American will make
conservatives more concern in the current laws. The article is aimed at
citizens of America who feel the compaction of a citizen. This articles brings
the question of how America is a “free country” and lets criminals in. This
article is aimed at the audience that are opposed to immigration reforms and
laws. The article did not address the opposition in the article making the audience
believe he is also opposed to immigration. The author uses logic by providing
the audience with Hallum’s testimony. He attempts to address the opposition in
the last paragraph by comparing the system that let the kidnaper in America
after what he did, calling it “Whatever system he had did not work.” This appeal
to the audience as the United States having the knowledge to be able to link
one and one. In my opinion the author is bias and in order to be able to agree
or disagree the author needs to provide more facts, statistics and more expert’s
testimony. However in my opinion I do think that the U.S has to create a policy
that links criminals from other countries inside the U.S before it is too late
and family and friends are at risk. caseof America kidnapped in Iraq
No comments:
Post a Comment