Blog stage three

In the article the author’s argument is that the stock market will soon get a wakeup call from the choices that president Trump is making this is shown in the second paragraph “But analysts now caution that Trumphoria in the stock market could soon crash into a harsh Washington reality” The author tries to persuade the opposition by proving experts testimony in paragraph three, “The stock market is completely wrong,” said Douglas Kass of hedge fund Seabreeze Partners. This shows how the author uses experts to persuade the audience. The author also uses statistics to attempt credibility in paragraph four and eleven “The bank’s stock price is up about 40 percent since Trump was eleceted, part of big rally in financial stocks on the assumption that Trump will be able to quickly roll back the Dodd-Frank financial reform act, something that Washington analysts also think will be much harder than the market seems to believe.” This shows the author using statistics to establish his credibility. Throughout the article the author tries to prove his credibility and by providing statistics and experts testimony to prove his credibility. The author’s argument against the stock market making decision that later on might turn out to be a mistake. I agree with the author. I believe that some of the trading and investments might not be the smartest idea without knowing the tax reform. The author can use more statistics and experts testimony from the opposition to be less bias and influence the audience better. By doing this the author can address the opposition.  

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/02/trump-stock-market-bubble-235328